Quantcast
Channel: PTC Community: Message List - Windchill
Viewing all 8876 articles
Browse latest View live

Windchill PDMlink Visualization option open all files removed?

$
0
0

Again, very late to the PDMLink 10 party here ... In PDMLink 9 there was an option to open all files when ProductView was launched. This meant that components for assemblies opened upon launch rather than having to manually click a radio box to load them.

 

Does anyone know if there is a way to achieve the same thing in PDMLink 10 / Creo View? Seems a little silly to me not to auto load the files. If I clicked on an assembly visualization then chances are really good I wanted to actually load it and see it.

 

Capture.PNG


Re: Query to get list of Groups and users available in Windchill

Re: "CAD part is not unique"

$
0
0

Hi David Schenken and Manjunath RV,

 

thanks for your replies.

In the meantime on Wednesday I found what the problem was and the workaround.

I already knew the error coming both in the case of "same number for prt and drw", and in the case of the upper case text.

But these were not my cases (unfortunately, cause I would have fix the problem sooner).

 

I discovered instead this issue:

 

-I retrieved, from the local disk, a step assembly which, together with all of his components, was already named on the disk. (the filenames);

- For reasons that I don't include here for easiness of description, upon retrieval one of his subassemblies took the default name that Creo gives to brand new unnamed stuff (it was asm0001);

- The problem was that there already was a asm0001 in another workspace, so when I firstly tried to save and upload the asm, it gave me the "CAD part is not unique" error;

- "no problem" I told myself, I just have to rename the asm0001 to, let's say, b.asm, and the problem is solved, as often done before.

- but no, the software told me again the same error as if even the new name b.asm was around somewhere (I renamed both file name and number)..

- with absolutely no idea of what the cause was, I solved the thing by simply erasing the asm from the WS, then I re-uploaded the asm and did, as first thing (before uploading), a local rename of the assembly so that there wasn't any asm0001 around. Then, I uploaded it and without any problem.

 

So, during the first retrieval it seemed like the software remembered that the previous name of b.asm was asm0001 (which had a conflict) and so "extended" somehow this conflict to b.asm (even if there wasn't any b.asm around!).

I think it might have been a problem lying "undergound", at level of the core machine-code (don't know how to call it) of CAD parts. (as if this core-machine-code associated to the cad part hadn't been renamed together with the "surface-level" name b.asm).

 

I hope to have been clear enough and maybe to have helped also the original poster Haris Surya, if this was his case too.

 

Bye

Re: Moving parts within the MBOM structure ?

$
0
0

I don't believe you can manually change their order, but you can change the Sorting order. That is controlled in the Views, Manage Structure Views window.

CAD Structure to Part Structure

$
0
0

I have recently been doing a lot of testing and learning in Windchill. Having no real training, and being tasked to solve a number of problems for our business units has led to me making some mistakes and having to fix them. Of course all of this is happening on our production server as well, because we don't have a test server. I've now caused one issue that I cannot figure out how to fix.

I believe that by using Set for Build, I have pushed the WTPart structure to the CAD Structure. This results in all of my models being removed from my assemblies when I open them. I need to reverse this and force the CAD Structure to populate the WTPart structure. How do I do this? I find myself getting confused about which way information is being pushed in the Compare CAD to WTPart and Compare WTPart to CAD windows, and I'm truly just fumbling around trying to learn (which I have learned a ton) since I cannot find good training information.

 

Thank you.

NC Category Tree / NC Trending Categories - Windchill API help

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are trying to pull the tree structure of two of the Nonconformance attributes "NC Category" & "NC Trending Categories", into Thingworx.

At Thingworx side, we can parse xml or json input; preferably with the tree (parent-child) details, and feed it to tree widget.

 

At Windchill side we need some help to develop the webject (xml or java code) to pass the attribute details.

Please let us know the right approach or API to get the above attributes along with parent-child (tree) details

 

Other details

Object - WCTYPE|com.ptc.qualitymanagement.nc.Nonconformance

Attribute Name - Nonconformance Category

Internal name - ncCategoryCode / ncCategoryPath

 

Object - com.ptc.qualitymanagement.nc.NCTrendingCode

Attribute Name - Nonconformance Trending Categories

Internal name - ncTrendingCode & ncTrendingPath

 

Please refer attached screenshots.

 

Thanks

Avinash

Re: Windchill PDMlink Visualization option open all files removed?

$
0
0

CHRISTOPHER REES wrote:

 

Again, very late to the PDMLink 10 party here ... In PDMLink 9 there was an option to open all files when ProductView was launched. This meant that components for assemblies opened upon launch rather than having to manually click a radio box to load them.

 

Does anyone know if there is a way to achieve the same thing in PDMLink 10 / Creo View?

Take a look at the following article on how to set server level preferences for Creo View:

https://support.ptc.com/appserver/cs/view/solution.jsp?n=CS32479

Re: Windchill PDMlink Visualization option open all files removed?

$
0
0

That article explains how to flow down settings but it doesn't mention my specific issue.

 

The option to open components by default seems to have disappeared. The question is can anyone confirm that it is indeed gone (may it just moved?) or if there is a work around to bring it back.


Advanced Replica/Vaulting Requirement with Multiple File Servers in USA and INDIA

$
0
0

We would like to configure Windchill server with 7 File Servers to achieve the following requirement.

 

There is a Product container X and user A is from US and user B is from India.Both are members of this Product Container.

Both members are required to design two separate product lines using Creo.

 

If user A checks in Creo data it should be deposited in US FCS Master vault and if user B checks in data then it should be deposited in India FCS master vault.

 

Is there any good bractice to configure Replica Vaulting Rules according to this requirement? How can we make sure that data is not stored centrally?

Re: Windchill PDMlink Visualization option open all files removed?

$
0
0

CHRISTOPHER REES wrote:

 

That article explains how to flow down settings but it doesn't mention my specific issue.

 

The option to open components by default seems to have disappeared. The question is can anyone confirm that it is indeed gone (may it just moved?) or if there is a work around to bring it back.

In Creo View 4.1 F000:

File > Options > General > Loading > Load Creo View data as:  Autoload all files

Re: Extract all Groups, user and its profile related information by java code

$
0
0

Shreyas,

 

Thank you so much, this really helps. But one question i'm able to fetch details of only 50 groups using the code whereas my Windchill instance has around 145 Unique groups in it.

 

I ran a DB query of "Select DISTINCT NAME from WTGROUP;" which gives me 145 groups, but when i run this code the code fetches details of 50 Groups only. Any pointers?

Re: Moving parts within the MBOM structure ?

$
0
0

Cheers Steven

 

We have only just started getting into MPMlink and would like to have the MBOMs ordered in the same way we do currently before pushing them through the

configurator, looks like this may not be possible.

 

Onwards and upwards.

 

Dale

Re: table is not displayed with proper table UI

$
0
0

Hello Austin Nabors-Keating,

 

If I am not wrong, you are using Windchill 11.0 and Internet Explorer. Please try adding below line to JSP at the beginning:

 

<%@ include file="/netmarkets/jsp/components/beginWizard.jspf"%>


And below line to end of the JSP:


<%@ include file="/netmarkets/jsp/util/end.jspf"%>

 

I hope this helps you.

 

Regards,

Shirish

Re: CAD Structure to Part Structure

$
0
0

I believe I found the clarification I needed. In the attached picture you can see that it states clearly that Build multi-level Part Structure propagates from left structure to right structure. That's the clear wording I needed. Everywhere else it had just said, "builds the structure" or "builds the part structure". Since I still don't trust PTCs use of the word "part", that always worries me. I mean, couldn't they come up with a word that isn't CONSTANTLY used for referencing 3D models to describe WTParts?

Build Structure.png

Making a Replica Vault to a non-Windchill computer

$
0
0

I am relatively sure this is not possible, but has anyone had any success with creating a Windchill Replica Vault on a computer that does not run Windchill, for example, a laptop?

My company is working with replicating vaults for convenient transfer of data without passing it through a WAN, much like in this thread. Windchill Content Replication


Re: Query to get list of Groups and users available in Windchill

$
0
0

Would you mind adding simple instructions for using the java class?

thx

Re: Making a Replica Vault to a non-Windchill computer

$
0
0

Not possible - a Windchill Replica cache needs a local install of Windchill (it's actually most of the same installation that is on the master server) but without the Database.

Issue During Windchill Upgrade

$
0
0

Hi Everyone,

 

I've started Upgrade Windchill PDMLink from 10.1 to 11. I'm facing issue during Upgrade at Execute Standalone Migrators activity. I'm getting below error...

 

(wt.org.orgResource/54) wt.org.OrganizationServicesException: Cannot process participant xyz because a related disconnected participant wt.org.WTOrganization:374 exists in the database


Here Source system is rehosted one for which domain name has been changed.


Any suggestions will be really helpful to me.

 

 

Regards,

Krishna



How to configure multiple Release states in Change Management ?

$
0
0

My part lifecycle state includes Open - Under Review - Alpha Release - Beta Release - Production Release - Cancelled.

On revise from Alpha, Beta or Production Release states, the part comes in Open State.

 

I have 3 subtypes of Change Notice (CN_1,CN_2,CN_3).
If CN_1 is raised on the parts, resulting objects should be released to Alpha release, for CN_2 - Beta release, for CN_3 - Production Release.

 

Since change transition allows only one target state, How can i achieve this ?
I don't want user to select the release target. Instead release target should automatically change depending on the change notice type.

Failed to build part error - HELP please

$
0
0

When I do a RIGHT CLICK to Build Associated Part, I will sometimes get this error.  Any suggestions?

 

The image attached, I'm basically Right Click, Build Associated Part, then I get that error.  The 12600453-6314.prt is RELEASED now, so not sure if the state change caused some issues.  I've had this happen before, and the only fix was to modify a part at released (basically do any random change to generate a new iteration), but that cannot be the soltution.

 

FYI, the 12600453-6314.prt is related as a IMAGE.  (We basically have a bunch of different tie wraps that are modeled and used to build the BOM).

Viewing all 8876 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>