Check in failed because "ModelCHECK failed on model(s) in the context "
Re: Check in failed because "ModelCHECK failed on model(s) in the context "
Appears that your Windchill system has a configuration in place which prevents checkin if ModelCheck has not been run or has too many errors.
Note: I disagree with this approach in general. You do not want to / have to prevent check-in. Users sometimes don't know how to fix an error that ModelCheck finds and get frustrated. Also, these errors are not significant during development. Instead, are far better approach is to use workflow(s) that pay attention to the ModelCheck attributes and branch accordingly.
Default option when deleting
Re: How to manage As-Build and As-Maintained BOM´s in PTC product portfolio?
Hi Tom
Thanks for the tip. It sounds great that PTC have the topic on the radar. Hope to see new functionality in the area earlier than 2020.
Best regards
Per
How can I insert a basic events in the dynamic gate FDEP (Functional Dependency Gate)?
Hello Guys,
I am building a dynamic fault tree, and I have some difficulty. Does anyone know how can I insert a basic events in the dynamic gate FDEP?
When I insert Logic Gate FDEP automatically opens the trigger, however I want to insert others 2 basic events that depend on the trigger.
I want to do this:
Anyone can help me please?!
Re: How can I insert a basic events in the dynamic gate FDEP (Functional Dependency Gate)?
Toby Metcalf could you please move this to the appropriate forum (based on the tags, I think that would be Windchill)
Re: SQL Query to find out BOM
Hi Stefan,
Try this query to get the BOM structure
SELECT M1.WTPARTNUMBER AS COMPONENT, M2.WTPARTNUMBER AS ASSEMBLY
FROM WTPART, WTPARTMASTER M2, WTPARTUSAGELINK, WTPARTMASTER M1
WHERE WTPART.IDA3MASTERREFERENCE = M2.IDA2A2
AND WTPART.IDA2A2 = WTPARTUSAGELINK.IDA3A5
AND WTPARTUSAGELINK.IDA3B5 = M1.IDA2A2
and M2.WTPARTNUMBER = '<Part_number>'
GROUP BY M2.WTPARTNUMBER, M1.WTPARTNUMBER
order by M2.WTPARTNUMBER, M1.WTPARTNUMBER;
is Windchill Quality Solutions 10.0 compatible with Windows 10?
I work with WQS 10.0 on Windows 7, and intend to move to Windows 10. Will it work as well?
Re: is Windchill Quality Solutions 10.0 compatible with Windows 10?
Good day Josafa,
The Community Help group is for discussions about PTC and Jive - I am moving this to the Windchill space to get it the right exposure.
Best,
Toby
Converting WT file as End Item WT
I have 60 top level assemblies and I created wt part for the same. Now I need all 60 wt part to be converted as End Items. Can I do this in Windchill or should I remove association of all wt, delete wt's, create End item wt and then associate it again with respective assemblies?
Re: Windchill log tool
You do know about http://yourHostAndPort/Windchill/wtcore/jsp/jmx/logFiles.jsp, right?
That provides an HTML UI for searching/browsing all the log files from the cluster.
Also, you know about http://yourHostAndPort/Windchill/wtcore/jsp/jmx/logEvents.jsp, right?
It provides an ability to search all "persisted" log events via the database. These are essentially the warnings and errors (captured by a custom log4j appender, AsyncJDBCAppender). The difference is that
- This uses database queries
- The log event data here is more structured and complete than that in the log file in cases
This is all assuming you're on 10.0 or later, of course. These capabilities (and all those accessible from https://yourHostAndPort/Windchill/wtcore/jsp/jmx/index.jsp) continue to improve in each release and MOR up through 11.0.
Of course, these are not the end-all-and-be-all, and, yes, you can configure socket appenders and set up chainsaw if you like -- or use Splunk or various other tools. It's just log4j and log files (apart from the custom database appender).
Re: Windchill log tool
P.S. Out-of-the-box most warnings are not captured to log files, whereas they are persisted to the database, so that's one big difference between the log files and the persisted log event data.
Re: Windchill log tool
Thanks for the info Jess. I am not much of a IT guy, I came from the Engineering side, before falling into the Dark Side. Is there more information about these tools in one of the guides?
Right now I am getting an access denied message from Tomcat, so obviously I need to learn more about this...
Re: Windchill log tool
I am not sure how much the guides cover these tools.
They're accessible from Site -> Utilities -> Server Status -> Monitoring Tools, but only accessible users who are either in the Site Administrators group or listed in the wt.util.jmx.AccessUtil.siteAdministrators property in wt.properties.
Some of the cross-reference links could use more explanation and fill in better search criteria in the page they land on in older releases. The latest releases have improved in these areas -- as well as adding various features here and there.
Re: Converting WT file as End Item WT
Hello Dhanraj,
If you just want to convert part to End item you can right click on WTPart and choose Edit Common Attributes action and Set End Item to Yes as shown in snapshot below.
The only issue is you have to do it manually for 60 items. You can use api also if you know how to do it programatically.
Where in Windchill mem model I do find back a representation added by publishing rule ?
Hi,
We have publishing rules active that will create dxf or step when needed during transit to Released. We can grab these files in windchill, but I wonder how are they stored in the api memory model ? I only get some jpegs and the pdf when asking for the contents of the SECONDARY role. Like with this code:
Re: Windchill log tool
Jess,
There is a directory missing in the path you typed.
Should be Windchill\codebase\wtcore\jsp\jmx
Re: Windchill log tool
Note that in each case I typed http://yourHostAndPort/Windchill/wtcore/jsp/jmx. That's the correct http(s) URL path.
At a file-system level, yes, "codebase" exists between Windchill and wtcore in the directory paths.
Re: Windchill log tool
Ah. Ok.
I typed in the URL path and it doesn't find it. I'm probably just typing something wrong. No big deal.
Re: Default option when deleting
I found same file is used for 10.1 M050 too.